###country-name###
$0 billion
Russian assets are frozen
$0 billion
Confiscation of assets of the Russian Federation
$0 billion
Ukraine's losses from the war
$0 billion
The frozen assets of the RF and its accomplices
$0 billion
Confiscated assets of the Russian Federation
We follow the confiscation of assets of the aggressor state and individuals responsible for the war
and share it with you
Learn more
Confiscation tracker
The project is implemented by the Institute of Legislative Ideas team
More about “Freeze and Seize”Map controls
map of confiscation of assets of the RF in the world
Assets are not frozen
Frozen
Creating mechanism
Speciallaw
Confiscation
Frozen
$1000000 billion
Confiscation
$5400 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$75664 billion
Confiscation
$75664 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$61480000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$20950000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$8200000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$5540000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$3900000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$2750000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$2500000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$1780000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$1700000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$1600000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$1200000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$925000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$684000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$350000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$219500 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$200340 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$103000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$80000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$73000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$45000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$43000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$41000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$38029 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$31000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$18300 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$11500 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$5000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$200 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$158 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$4 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$115543695 billion
Confiscation
$81064 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$465000 billion
Confiscation
$465000 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$193000000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$71000000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$58000000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$26000000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$17000000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$7950000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$5000000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$5000000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$333000 billion
Confiscation
$0 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Frozen
$383748000 billion
Confiscation
$465000 billion
transferred
$0 billion
Japan has allocated Ukraine $3 billion from the frozen assets of the russian federation
Japan
Japan allocates $3 billion to Ukraine as part of G7 $50 billion loan initiative
16 Nov 2024
Japan
The second tranche of the EU for military needs of Ukraine may be €1.9 billion
European Union
The EU will continue to supply Ukraine with ammunition, air defense systems, and will continue to invest in the Ukrainian defense industry
15 Nov 2024
European Union
EU needs to rethink Russian sanctions to cut energy costs, Hungary's Orban says
Hungary
According to Orban, these high prices hinder the economic competitiveness of the bloc
15 Nov 2024
Hungary
Подання заяви про завдані збитки до міжнародного Реєстру збитків для України: практичні поради постраждалим
Порадник покликаний допомогти постраждалому отримати чітку та стислу інформацію щодо можливості подання ним відповідної заяви та про кроки, які потрібно зробити.
12 Sep 2024
Установлення фактичного контролю над активом і захист прав третіх осіб у практиці застосування санкції стягнення активів в дохід держави
#assets management
Дослідження присвячене санкції, передбаченій пунктом 1-1 ч. 1 ст. 4 ЗУ «Про санкції», а саме - стягнення в дохід держави активів, що належать фізичній або юридичній особ
29 May 2024
A tariff must be imposed on companies that continue to operate in Russia
The burden of financing the military assistance and reconstruction of Ukraine must be placed on the aggressor state and the companies that fund the aggression, not Western taxpa…
24 May 2024
Frequently asked questions
General questions
Why should the assets of the aggressor state and it's accomplices be confiscated?
Since the beginning of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the actions of the Russian Federation and individuals who actively contribute to the aggression (Russian politicians, propagandists, oligarchs, etc.) have caused enormous economic loss, which as of early 2023 is estimated at more than $700 billion.
First, the damage caused by the war is now being covered by Ukraine and its international partners. Neither Russia nor the Russians are willing to pay for the damage caused until Russia is completely defeated on the battlefield, which they do not think to be plausible. Confiscation of their assets will make it possible to shift the economic burden of rebuilding Ukraine onto the shoulders of the perpetrators right now and will allow to compensate for the damage before the war ends.
Second, those responsible for the war have not lost anything personal yet, as they have been adapting to the sanctions since 2014. Realizing that the freezing of their assets is the most severe sanction they may face and there is no risk of actually losing those assets, responsible persons do not have proper incentive to change their course of actions. The continuation of the war thus is not assosiated with personal losses for these people. In fact, some State Duma deputies have been making profits from renting out property frozen in the EU for many years.
Third, implementing confiscation measures ensures prevention of the similar actions by other aggressors in the future. From now on, such crimes will not go unpunished, neither for countries nor for individuals who contribute to aggression. Anyone who intends to commence a war of aggression or support it in any way will have to realize that they will have to pay for it with their wealth. Personal liability with the prospect of losing personal property will constitute a strong incentive to stop supporting military aggression not only against Ukraine but also against any other country in the world.
Is such confiscation lawful?
Debates in various parliaments and governments around the world have shown that this issue is one of the most vulnerable and may be easily manipulated with.
Currently, there exist international customs unfavorable for the purposes of confiscation which may be used by the aggressor state to avoid responsibility for the damages and losses it has inflicted.
However, implementing confiscation measures ensures prevention of the similar actions by other aggressors in the future. From now on, such crimes will not go unpunished, neither for countries nor for individuals who contribute to aggression. Anyone who intends to commence th agressive war or support it in any way will have to realize that they will have to pay for it with their wealth and resources. Personal liability with the prospect of losing personal property will constitute a strong incentive to stop supporting military aggression not only against Ukraine but also against any other country in the world.
What confiscation mechanisms exist and can be utilized?
The broad array of instruments can be used to confiscate the assets of the Russian Federation and war supporters.
States can employ the tools that are alreready in place, for example, confiscation within the framework of criminal prosecution.
The other tool is the so-called NCBF (Non-Conviction Based Forfeiture). For example, assets of persons engaged in mafia activities (in Italy) or corrupt officials (in Georgia) have already been confiscated in civil proceedings with a lower standard of proof and within a shorter timeframe. The tool could potentially be used against those who actively contribute to military aggression.
New mechanisms are being developed in the context of military aggression and the need to confiscate assets as a result of such actions. Ukraine has introduced special tools for confiscation of Russian state assets and assets of war collaborators. Similar legislation has been adopted in Canada. Special instruments are also being developed in the EU countries and in the United States, where relevant acts are being developed or have already been submitted to parliaments for consideration.
What are the actions of civilized states with respect to the confiscation of Russian assets?
The cynical and brutal nature of the Russian invasion led to the fact that, despite the rather complicated balance of power in world politics, most countries unanimously condemned Russia as an aggressor. At the very beginning of the war, the vast majority of UN member states (141 out of 193) officially condemned Russia's aggression in Ukraine and voted for a resolution in the UN General Assembly, using the rather rare Uniting for Peace mechanism. This procedure bypasses the UN Security Council, where Russia's veto as a permanent member would have made such a statement impossible.
After the full-scale invasion of Ukraine on February 24, the sanctions policy towards Russia has become unprecedented. Russia has taken the lead in terms of sanctions imposed on a single country.
Along with numerous embargoes and price caps on oil and oil products, countries have begun to freeze the assets of Russia and its accomplices . To date, about $417 billion of Russian assets have been frozen worldwide and $5.4 million has been confiscated.
In addition to the political decision to freeze assets, countries are actively working to design and implement the legal mechanisms necessary to confiscate frozen assets and transfer them to Ukraine.
Private assets
Private assets
It is well known that Russian politicians, propagandists, oligarchs, and others who actively contribute to the war against Ukraine and have made enormous fortunes due to their proximity to the Putin regime prefer to keep their wealth abroad. Despite their hatred of everything 'Western' and threats of nuclear strikes, they do not hesitate to own mansions, yachts, and private jets in countries 'unfriendly' to Russia.
The confiscation of such assets, in addition to pursuing the goal of allocating funds for the reconstruction of Ukraine, constitutes a personal liability measure that can affect the behavior of a particular person.
It is the individual liability of aggressors and its inevitability that can become the personal risk that can actually make the responsible persons change their behavior in relation to the aggression and prevent further wars in the world.
How many private assets can be confiscated?
Given the large amount of assets that war supporters hold around the world, different approaches to confiscation in different countries, and the efforts to hide assets in offshore companies and through third parties, it is almost impossible to estimate the exact amount of assets. However, we can use as a basis the estimate of the frozen private assets of sanctioned persons. Although due to the active dynamics of blocking and different approaches to publishing this information, our estimates show that as of the beginning of 2023, approximately USD 100 billion of such assets were frozen worldwide.
More information on which countries froze most and which countries froze less can be found on our interactive map.
Has any country already confiscated the assets of war collaborators and what is hindering the progress?
Asset freezing does not allow transferring them to Ukraine. For this purpose, confiscation must be exerted, which, in turn, requires the development of an appropriate legal mechanism. Naturally, Ukraine was the first country to introduce a special mechanism for confiscating private assets of war collaborators. As of the beginning of 2023, there are more than 10 judgments on the confiscation of assets of Russian oligarchs, propagandists and politicians.
Canada, using a newly enacted law, is confiscating the assets of Russian oligarch Abramovich; the United States, employ the existing civil forfeiture mechanism and a corresponding amendment to the Budget Act to transfer to Ukraine $5.4 million confiscated from Russian media mogul Malofeyev accused of circumventing sanctions.
Despite the significant amount of frozen assets, some countries, including the EU, have been reluctant to confiscate them, as they are looking for a proper, legally reliable tool that would not violate the right to private property. Compliance with the highest standards of human rights protection and the right to a fair trial is the key prerequisite for such confiscation, so the search for the proper avenue is still in progress.
Sovereign assets
What are sovereign assets?
The sovereign assets of the Russian Federation are funds and property owned by the Russian Federation as a state, as well as funds and property owned by the companies whose authorized capital is controlled by the Russian Federation.
Since the beginning of the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, most countries holding the funds of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation have blocked them. These include Germany, France, the United Kingdom, the United States, Japan, Austria, and Canada. Only China has not blocked Russian funds in its accounts.
According to the information published by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation and other statistics, it is about $300 billion. As of 2023, Europe, in particular, is trying to update the data on the amount of blocked sovereign funds.
In addition to the Central Bank's funds, Russian state assets consist of several hundred property objects around the world, in addition to companies with a Russian share in the authorized capital owning real estate worth billions of dollars.
All these assets of the aggressor state should be confiscated and transferred to Ukraine for its reconstruction and compensation for the damage caused.
Can we expect the assets of the Russian Central Bank to be confiscated?
No doubt, the confiscation of $300 billion belonging to the aggressor state would be a significant support for Ukraine. The need for the confiscation is repeatedly emphasized by senior officials of Ukraine and some other countries.
However, the world hesitates to confiscate and transfer the frozen assets of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. The first reason is the sovereign immunity of the Russian Federation which prevents interference with the property rights of a state. Moreover, the current international customary law provides special protection for the property of states' central banks. The second reason is the lack of political will, as this could set a dangerous precedent that would negatively affect the willingness of states to hold assets in other countries.
Currently, the search is underway for an optimal mechanism for the confiscation of these assets that would be acceptable from the point of view of international law. Ukraine's most determined partners argue for the need to conclude an international treaty that would allow such confiscation, while a moderate partners are only willing to send Ukraine the proceeds from the management of frozen assets.
Does the Russian Federation have any property abroad that can be confiscated?
Apart from embassies' and consulates' property, the aggressor state owns hundreds of land plots and real estate objects - apartments, estates, religious buildings, etc.
Information on Russia's foreign property used to be publicly available. However, in 2015, after the annexation of Crimea, the first sanctions and the freezing of assets to enforce the Yukos judgment, this information was hidden.
According to Russian journalists, based on the report of the Accounts Chamber of the Russian Federation, as of 2012, Russia owned 973 objects abroad - 166 land plots and 807 buildings and premises, mostly in the capitals of the countries. These assets are still directly managed by the Russian state, and therefore it is likely that these objects serve as a cover for the activities of the aggressor country's agent base around the world.
At present, it is difficult to assess the exact value of such assets. It may reach hundreds of billions of dollars, which should be transferred to Ukraine.